“Government of the people, by the people, and for the people.”

– Abraham Lincoln

“...makapagtatag ng sarili at malayang pamahalaan, na sa makat‘wid, ay mamahala ang bayan sa bayan, at hindi ang isa o dalawang tao lamang”

– Andres Bonifacio

Essential Elements of Democracy

How democratic is your country?

1. Access to power and its exercise in accordance with the rule of law
2. Respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.
3. Transparency and accountability in public administration
4. The holding of periodic free and fair elections by universal suffrage and by secret ballot as the expression of the will of the people.
5. Freedom of association
6. The separation of powers
7. Free, independent, and pluralistic media
8. Freedom of expression and opinion
9. A pluralistic system of political parties and organizations
10. The independence of the judiciary

All 1 questions completed!


Want more stuff like this?

Get the best viral stories straight into your inbox!
Don`t worry, we don`t spam

Critics also say that democracy is slow and inefficient in responding to people’s needs.

“Too much democracy?”

“Is democracy a western concept and a foreign imposition?”

01 04

Dictatorship refers to centralization of power to a single entity.

The leader personifies the entire political structure as she rules without limitations 

CHECKLIST FOR DICTATORSHIP

  • Institutions for intensified intelligence gathering

  • Domination and control of politics and social actions

  • Bureaucratization of society and political structures

  • Strong administrative and punitive instruments

  • Regulation of culture

  • Controls of instruments of repression

+ Show all items

AXIS OF DICTATORS

ADOLF HITLER

GERMANY
(1933 - 1945)

started the bloodiest war in history and killed 6 million Jewish people (Holocaust)

POL POT

CAMBODIA
(1975 - 1979)

responsible for Khmer Rouge mass killing and mass graves

GENERAL FRANCISCO FRANCO

SPAIN
(1939 - 1975)

 in collaboration with Hitler, executed thousands of enemies in 3 decade rule; reestablished Spain‘s monarchy

FERDINAND MARCOS SR.

Philippines
(1965 - 1986)

responsible for massive human rights violations and destruction of democratic institutions

 

JOSEF STALIN

RUSSIA
(1929 - 1953)

responsible for the purges of counter-revolutionaries

AUGUSTO PINOCHET

CHILE
(1973 - 1990)

banned opposition parties and responsible for the murder and forced disappearance of his opposition

Marcos and any other dictators had a cult of personality.

They had self-glorifying and conceited portraits hung in public places

ANOINTED BY... GOD?

In trying to capture the mass through Filipino people’s deeply entrenched religiosity, Marcos, as quoted in Unjieng (2009), claimed to have talked to God in his dream and ordered him to save the country because [according to him] he was the only person who can do it…no one else can.

Aside from capturing people’s mind through religion, the regime also tried to capitalize on Filipino culture, championing the Malakas and Maganda narrative.

As father and mother of the Filipinos, Marcos instilled discipline by rewarding the ”good” with a better life and punishing the ”bad”.

BAGONG LIPUNAN SONG

The Bagong Lipunan is a song composed by Felipe Padilla De Leon. It was compulsory to play this song after the Philippine National Anthem

As euphoric as it may seem, the song is nothing but a representation of how the regime ultimately aimed to capture the minds and hearts of the Filipino people.

01 04

The 1969 presidential election between Marcos Sr. and Osmenia Jr. was tagged by protesters as Lokohan 69.

LOKOHAN
69

Marcos won overwhelmingly against Sergio Osmeña Jr., as Marcos used the government machinery in his campaign. 

 

His reelection for a second term in 1969 saw the most violent and fraudulent elections of the post war period.

It was also marked by an economy in crises and increasing disappointment of the people.

OPLAN SAGITTARIUS

On September 13, 1972, Ninoy Aquino, in his privilege speech, exposed Oplan Sagittarius.

Oplan Sagittarius is the master plan of a multi-faceted operation for declaring martial law.

MARCOS' DIARY

“I want to perpetuate in power…”

ROLEX 12

Marcos met regularly  with this group of military men who shall implement Martial Law., known in history as Rolex 12

Juan Ponce Enrile,
Maj. Gen. Fidel V. Ramos,
Maj. Gen. Fabian Ver,
“Danding” Cojuangco, Jr.
Gen. Rafael Zagala,
Brig Gen. Tomas Diaz,
Gen. Romeo Espino,
Maj. Gen. Jose Rancudo,
Admiral Hilario Ruiz,
Gen. Ignacio Paz,
Gen. Alfredo Montoya
Col. Romeo Gatan.

“Hindi malala ang sitwasyon d’yan sa New People’s Army na kayang sugpuin naman ng ating armed forces through small unit actions only.”

MANUAL YAN

Chief of Staff, 1968-1972 ARMED FORCES OF THE PHILIPPINES

“It was one of the best things that happened in Philippine history…

we saved democracy.”

Despite what truly happened on the ground, Imelda Marcos has an illusion that their regime saved democracy.

 She said in PDI in 1999

But the five items below show a different picture.

1. Suspension of Freedom of Expression and Right to Information

On 23 September, the Filipino people woke up with no news paper. Most radio and TV stations were padlocked and ceased

Consequently, Voltes V, a Japanese cartoon about young people “volting” in against a tyrannical enemy, was stopped towards its concluding episodes.

2. Political oppositions, media, and journalists were immediately imprisoned

Over the next hours upon the declaration of Martial Law, some eight thousand perceived enemies of the state were arrested (Franco, 2000), including Senators Benigno Aquino Jr, Jovito Salonga and Jose Diokno.

 

3. Rubber Stamp Batasan

The Philippine congress was closed and padlocked.

4. The Supreme Court was  censured and used to legitimize Martial Rule

Even though the gagged Supreme Court questioned the legality of the conduct of the plebiscite, this did not prevent Marcos from ratifying the 1973 constitution by signing the Proclamation 1102. 

5. Elections and plebiscites were called “Lutong Makoy” because they were manipulated in favor of Marcos and his candidates

Ratification of the 1973 constitution was called Monkey Plebiscite. In fact, “Sino ang may gusto ng libreng bigas?” was one of the questions asked during the plebiscite by show of hands in ratifying the most supreme law of the land (Quoted in Batas Militar, 2007)

Despite its dubious process, according to Marcos, the 1973 Constitution was ratified with 91% affirmative vote, thereby allowing him to continue beyond 1973.

01 05

What is FDHR and its objectives?

This Exhibition aims to provide information and awareness to young people on the events that had transpired during the Martial Law period (1972-81). It hopes to create a platform to reintroduce and debate on the values of human rights and democracy through looking at the stories and lessons from Martial Law and from the first EDSA People Power Revolt.

For this purpose, the Center for Youth Advocacy and Networking, with support from the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung—Philippine Office, has gathered young academics and historians, artists, and leaders to brainstorm, develop, deepen and visualize, in order to communicate with their peers. The product of these exercises are 4 academic essays which serve as main references; a 19-panel exhibition divided into four main groups: (1) democracy and dictatorship; (2) human rights; (3) timeline; and (4) FAQs/Myths. While the panels are self-explanatory, an exhibition guide is provided to provide further details and deeper discussions.

The Exhibition invites young people to a time warp, 40 years ago, in 1972 when Martial law was declared, or even earlier in 1965 when Ferdinand Marcos was first elected President and more recent and more familiar is the EDSA People Power in 1986, 25 years ago. These two events mark the darkest post war event in our history and the testament to the greatness of a people united. The Exhibition provides young people with tidbits of information, perhaps an appetizer to wanting more

How long would the FDHR Online Tour take?

To get the best out of the exhibit, we recommend for the visitors to browse all the panels. The online tour will take at least 1-2 hour/s to finish. However, if you wish to only get a particular information, you can go directly to the topic you want to learn about.

Center for Youth Advocacy and Networking

CYAN envisions a society that recognizes the youth sector as stakeholders in providing for an enabling environment for active citizenship, alternative politics, progressive reforms and dynamic involvement in social development work.


In attaining its vision, CYAN strives to: optimize youth activism through innovative programs and approaches; sustain and expand partnership among youth organization that effectively empowers the youth; sustain sectoral advocacy for a developmental youth reform agenda and progressive democratic roles in the society.


CYAN’s organizational life is imbued with these values: social inclusion and participation, equality and partnership, commitment to serve and empower, intelligent and innovative activism and authentic humanization.


Thus, Building an Alternative Youth Institute is a constant reminder for CYAN to lead and act together with the youth for the youth, broaden our horizons to make a difference, disrupt the system and change it.

FES Philippines

The work of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung in the Philippines started in 1964. Its focus is on the promotion of democracy and the strengthening of social and ecological dimensions of economic development through education, research, political dialogue, and international cooperation. The FES Philippine Office cooperates with national and local government institutions, trade unions, political and social movements, non-government organizations, media practitioners and groups, scientific institutions, individual experts, and other international organizations.


The programs and projects of the FES Philippine Office gives special focus on:

  • Empowering marginalized social sectors and groups to represent their interests in areas of socio-economic and socio-political decision-making;
  • Promoting socio-political dialogue in the understanding that peace and democracy can only prevail on the basis of sharing and compromising; and,
  • Exchange program and international cooperation to build awareness of global interdependence of states and societies and the need for multilateralism with fair participation.